requestId:684c3e41f19393.21520880.
The meaning of the “righteous” discussion of Song Ming’s “righteous” theory
Author: Zheng Wei (professored by Shanxi University of Literature and Literature)
Source: “Shanxi University of Science. Philosophy and Social Science Edition”, 2021 Issue 1
Abstract
The correct statement expresses that Song Ming’s “realistic ideas” have clear and public consciousness, and theorists practice “see the way of thinking about the common sense彩彩” is always to expand your own income into a knowledge that can be widely shared. This is a natural process towards the common nature of the light. In this process, theorists think about the world order with “righteousness” and use “public heart” to achieve the interconnected and forgiving relationship between man and the world, thus erecting the dialogue tree on the basis of this world unity and leading the individual life of the person to the existence of the cosmic life and the existence of the cosmic life. As a life experience or skill, the science of science is based on this logic, which provides precious experiences of ethnicity for contemporary Chinese studies.
Keywords:Right; public; self-satisfaction; mental experience; Kung Fu
In recent years, Teacher Zhang Jiang has put forward the idea of ”public theory” in a series of articles represented by “Public theory”. He determined the oriental theory because he gave up his meaning<a The pursuit of nourishing the Internet VIP has taken an extremely relative and impolite path, resulting in no effort to develop the reality of the challenge of globalization in contemporary times. The attempt is to coordinate human destiny. If no one recognizes it, we will wait for it to grow." "The Chinese plan and Chinese wisdom are highlighted under the framework of "Public Discussion" as the middle. Teacher Zhang Jiang teaches In the texts such as "Bao, Distinguishing", "Reason, Distinguishing", "Interpretation, Distinguishing", and other articles, we focus on exploring the dialogue energy and public thinking of Chinese classical slogans, and in "Infinite and Infinite", "The Confirmation of Indeterminate Relationships", "The Righteousness of Logical slogans", "The Confirmation of Logical slogans", "The Confirmation of Logical slogans", "The Confirmation of Logical slogans", "The Confirmation of Logical slogans", "The Confirmation of Logical slogans", "The Confirmation of Logical slogans", and "The Concern of Logical slogans", "The Concern of Logical slogans", and "The Concern of Logical slogans", "The Concern of Logical slogans", and "The Concern of Logical slogans". In his conversations with John Tompson and Mike Fertherstone, he focused on the question of the definiteness of the boundaries, public sentiment (rightness and rules) and meaning. He said:
王口博官网 is a public behavior. The public identity of the sensibility determines the publicity of human sensibility. The purpose of the public sensibility is the authenticity of knowledge and the determination of sensibility. The operation paradigm of public sensibility is determined by the basic human cognitive standards. The sensibility of public sensibility is the law of number that understands the law of numbers that suits random processes. The connotation of the public sensibility is: the sensible person has a broad historyConditions are the basis, text is the object of meaning, and public sensibility produces boundaries and can be used in a common sense. [1]
This secretly defines the connotation, goals and conditions of public stigma, and it has three important meanings: First, any stigma is a public behavior that is spoken by others, so public stigma calls on public understanding—this is all self-nature requests. Second, the achievement of public understanding has the determination of public sentiment in terms of rules, awareness paradigms and objectivity, thus establishing a world of meaning of “multi-party cooperation”. Third, the theoretical morality of public opinion: it focuses on the ethics and mission issues of learning, and believes that public opinion is essentially a public speaking reality. This metaphysical structure is based on the relationship between contemporary Oriental Circle and the self-understanding and self-existence of the Circle.
So Zhang Jiang turned his attention to the modern Chinese, and proposed to look at the traditional Chinese civilization, and use the East to build contemporary Chinese learning. This also created the current research and development of the current research and discussion on the emphasis on the modern Chinese academic system (including academic and modern literature). In the eyes of writers, the essence of Chinese classical sci-
Song and Ming dynasties lies in the essence of the Song and Ming dynasties. This is because, on the one hand, from the perspective of the philosophy represented by the science, it has a broad and remote view of the oriental “metaphysics of this place”; on the other hand, from the relationship between the individuality and commonality of the science reminded by words such as “satisfaction” and “righteousness”, it corresponds to the public understanding of the verbal and the morality of the verbal, and reflects the tradition of the verbal race. This article uses the “righteous” discussion of Song and Ming dynasties as an example to illustrate this problem.
1. The principle of righteousness or public
Before Song Dynasty, the word “righteousness” appeared in fragmentary form in “Guanzi” and some historical materials. “Guanzi·Shaping Interpretation” says: “When practicing the way of heaven, he will lead to righteousness, and those who are far away will respect themselves; when the way of heaven, he will do private affairs, and the mother and son will complain.” [2] 400 “Three Kingdoms·Zhang Wenqiu” says: “When Cao Lang Xu Biao chose to use personal friendship, he hated love, and he could not help but be righteous. href=”https://www.taiwanblog.net/Amber/%e7%ac%ac%e4%b8%80%e6%ac%a1%e8%88%87%e5%8c%85%e9%a4%8a%e7%b6%b2%e8%aa%8d%e8%ad%98/”>Inclusive network meaning.”[3]745 What is discussed here is the principle of politics. The so-called “righteousness” is the principle of fairness and selflessness, a broad rule of governance. “The Northern History·Song Bianqi” also said: “Empress Dowager Ling was in power and appointed Yuan Cha, relying on his support to win the throne, and he was always punished with righteousness.” [4] 938 “Editor of Continuing the Governance of the General Secretary”: “On the other day, we welcomed all over our state, the order of the relocation and prosecution departments.The second statement was not based on the right meaning. ”[5]10174 “Gu Rang Ji” Volume 16: “All Qing troops, introduction, investigation, and review and enquiry are all based on the right meaning of their subordinates, and they are suitable for them. ”[6]650 Here is the specific use of “righteousness”, which is similar to the concept of “public law”, which is an objective basis for severing politics. In short, the above applies the word “righteousness” in political or legal meaning, which emphasizes the internal standardization of “righteousness” and its social integrationenhanced performance.
This is clearly different from the correct statements of Song and Ming Neo-Confucianism. If the “Guanzi” and other words emphasize the political principle of “to be able to be public, to be rational, to be rational”, Song and Ming Neo-Confucianism tends to express a life state of “the heart is open but the reason is obtained” and “but the concealment is the most common”, so It is difficult to directly replace social concepts such as fairness and righteousness. When a ruling scholar talks about “righteousness” and put it on “public” or “public”, there are several important meanings.
(1) “The heart is open and the reason is obtained”
Zhu Xi explained the way of reading Mencius’s “forgiving”: “Reflecting on one’s body is kind, but the reason is not pure. Therefore, when you are encouraged to do everything and push yourself to others, you will be able to achieve a correct mind and benevolence without being far away. ”[7]350 Zhu Xi believed that “the principles of all things are contained in my body”[7]350, so “forgiveness” means that the principle of communicating all things with the same principles as my heart, and the key is “publicity of the heart”, that is, after self-respect, one can attain the state of integrity of the law of nature. The lexicon said “no integrity of nothing”, and said that the truth of the heart is clear, and that the truth of the heart is clear, and that the truth of the heart is clearcover the message board, so you can “focus on the mind like a mirror”, reflecting all things and flowing with the six-content. Cheng’s “Answer to the Teacher of the Qun Qu̶